Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • Both cost about the same: $1.25 input and $4.25 output per million tokens.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus specifications
Muse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.9—
Released2026-04-082025-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$5
Results tracked371

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—
LMArena Coding1498—
ALE-Bench—456.5

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
APEX-Agents31.8%—
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
ProofBench39%—
LMArena Math1483—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
LMArena Expert1478—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Vision1293—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Non-English1472—
LMArena Chinese1518—
LMArena French1494—
LMArena German1466—
LMArena Japanese1451—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1483—
LMArena Spanish1464—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1457—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Longer Query1462—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Text1479—
LMArena Creative Writing1437—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—
LMArena Multi-Turn1485—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper