Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#43); Qwen3.5-2B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-2B Alibaba (Qwen)

28.7

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 18.5.
  • Qwen3.5-2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.5-2B specifications
Muse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.928.7
Released2026-04-082026-02-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked361

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38), Qwen3.5-2B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—
LMArena Coding1497—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45), Qwen3.5-2B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41), Qwen3.5-2B: 18.5

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.32—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67), Qwen3.5-2B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
ProofBench39%—
LMArena Math1477—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55), Qwen3.5-2B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
LMArena Expert1480—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28), Qwen3.5-2B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
LMArena Vision1292—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16), Qwen3.5-2B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
LMArena Non-English1471—
LMArena Chinese1518—
LMArena French1494—
LMArena German1466—
LMArena Japanese1445—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Russian1482—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36), Qwen3.5-2B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
LMArena Instruction Following1457—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55), Qwen3.5-2B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
LMArena Longer Query1463—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11), Qwen3.5-2B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.5-2B
LMArena Text1479—
LMArena Creative Writing1440—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—
LMArena Multi-Turn1484—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.5-2B?

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#43); Qwen3.5-2B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.5-2B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-2B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper