Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Phi-2

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Phi-2 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and Phi-2 specifications
Muse Spark 1.1Phi-2
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index49.9—
Released2026-04-082023-12-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3711

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), Phi-2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—
LMArena Coding1498—
HumanEval+—45.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), Phi-2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
APEX-Agents31.8%—
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), Phi-2: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21107.94
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Adversarial NLI—42.5%
BIG-Bench Hard—59.4%
HellaSwag—53.6%
WinoGrande—54.7%

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), Phi-2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
ProofBench39%—
LMArena Math1483—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), Phi-2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
LMArena Expert1478—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.9%
MMLU—58.4%
OpenBookQA—73.6%
TriviaQA—45.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), Phi-2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
LMArena Vision1293—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), Phi-2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
LMArena Non-English1472—
LMArena Chinese1518—
LMArena French1494—
LMArena German1466—
LMArena Japanese1451—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1483—
LMArena Spanish1464—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), Phi-2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
LMArena Instruction Following1457—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), Phi-2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
LMArena Longer Query1462—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), Phi-2: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Phi-2
LMArena Text1479—
LMArena Creative Writing1437—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—
LMArena Multi-Turn1485—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Phi-2?

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Phi-2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper