Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 25.8.
  • Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Muse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index49.930.3
Released2026-04-08—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3710

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding14981016
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
APEX-Agents31.8%—
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1486993
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math14831018
ProofBench39%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
LMArena Expert1478—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1293—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1472977
LMArena Chinese15181014
LMArena Russian1483947
LMArena French1494—
LMArena German1466—
LMArena Japanese1451—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Spanish1464—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1457978

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1462—

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text14791032
LMArena Creative Writing1437990
LMArena Multi-Turn14851007
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper