Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs o1-pro

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

o1-pro OpenAI

31.5

Rank #271 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 20.4.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and o1-pro specifications
Muse Spark 1.1o1-pro
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index49.931.5
Released2026-04-082025-03-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M200K
Max output131K100K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$150
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$600
Results tracked373

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), o1-pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—
LMArena Coding1498—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), o1-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
APEX-Agents31.8%—
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
ARC-AGI-1—23.3%
CritPt15.1%—
EnigmaEval—6.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), o1-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
ProofBench39%—
LMArena Math1483—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
LMArena Expert1478—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), o1-pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
LMArena Vision1293—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), o1-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
LMArena Non-English1472—
LMArena Chinese1518—
LMArena French1494—
LMArena German1466—
LMArena Japanese1451—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1483—
LMArena Spanish1464—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), o1-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1457—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), o1-pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
LMArena Longer Query1462—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), o1-pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1o1-pro
LMArena Text1479—
LMArena Creative Writing1437—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—
LMArena Multi-Turn1485—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than o1-pro?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or o1-pro?

Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and o1-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper