Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 3 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 58.8% for Muse Spark 1.1 and 42.7% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Muse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderMetaAmazon
Noometry Index49.933.4
Released2026-04-082025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked373

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode58.8%42.7%
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
LMArena Coding1498—

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GDP.pdf15%2%
APEX-Agents31.8%—
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt15.1%0%
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProofBench39%—
LMArena Math1483—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
LMArena Expert1478—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision1293—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1472—
LMArena Chinese1518—
LMArena French1494—
LMArena German1466—
LMArena Japanese1451—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1483—
LMArena Spanish1464—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1457—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1462—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1479—
LMArena Creative Writing1437—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—
LMArena Multi-Turn1485—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper