Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Ring-2.6-1T
Muse Glimmer has enough public results to be ranked (#131); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 0 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 2 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 44.9% | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 2.6% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
Math Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Muse Glimmer has enough public results to be ranked (#131); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Muse Glimmer or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 40.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Ring-2.6-1T share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.