Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1016 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 993 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 947 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | — |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.