Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Muse Glimmer leads 50.5 to 42.6.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1347 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1322 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1305 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1308 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1299 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 39.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.