Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.5 to 19.5.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1210 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1208 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1187 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.