Model comparison

Muse Glimmer vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.3

Rank #128 Confirmed

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

39.3

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.7 to 48.5.

Side by side

Muse Glimmer and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Muse GlimmerNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index41.339.3
Released—2026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.06
Output $ / M tokens—$0.16
Results tracked1318

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.6 (#143)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Coding14171370
LMArena WebDev1355—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 25.7 (#128)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts13951335

Math Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 34.7 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Math14191355

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 36.9 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Expert13881354

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English13841292
LMArena Chinese14121356
LMArena Russian13931257
LMArena French—1369
LMArena German—1280
LMArena Japanese—1213
LMArena Korean—1233
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.8 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following13741317

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#160)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query13811312

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#198)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text13891324
LMArena Creative Writing13381254
LMArena Multi-Turn13981327
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Glimmer or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.7 vs 39.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper