Model comparison

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#43); Muse Glimmer 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer 30B Meta

55.5

Unranked Sparse

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer 30B leads 69.9 to 63.8.
  • Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
  • Muse Glimmer 30B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Muse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index55.551.5
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K262K
Max output16K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$1.30
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$7.80
Results tracked129

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Glimmer 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
LMArena Coding—1471

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Glimmer 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Glimmer 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.24

Math Not comparable

Muse Glimmer 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
LMArena Math—1465
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Glimmer 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
LMArena Expert—1478

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Glimmer 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English—1437
LMArena Chinese—1487
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Russian—1445
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Glimmer 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1438

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Glimmer 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1457

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer 30B leads

Muse Glimmer 30B: 69.9, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text—1447
LMArena Creative Writing—1435
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1798—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#43); Muse Glimmer 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer 30B has 1 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper