Model comparison

Molmo 2 8b vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.1

Rank #119 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 60.0 to 49.4.

Side by side

Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B specifications
Molmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.142.1
Released—2026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked527

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena WebDev—1360
SciCode—35.6%
LMArena Coding—1436

Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Hard Prompts12871421
NYT Connections (extended)—51.7%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—51.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84.3%
LMCA—32.2%

Math Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Math—1432

Knowledge Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.2%
LMArena Expert—1432

Multimodal Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Vision10811245

Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Non-English12761400
LMArena Chinese—1462
LMArena French—1442
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1367
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Russian—1400
LMArena Spanish—1424

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Instruction Following12701399

Long Context Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Longer Query—1410

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Text12881417
LMArena Creative Writing—1368
LMArena Multi-Turn—1416

Frequently asked questions

Is Molmo 2 8b better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper