Model comparison
Molmo 2 8b vs Qwen3 14B
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Molmo 2 8b leads 24.5 to 18.1.
Side by side
| Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 35.0 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 5 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 24.5 (#146), Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1288 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: 29.5 (#106), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1081 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: 42.8 (#186), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: 67.2 (#196), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: 49.5 (#187), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Molmo 2 8b better than Qwen3 14B?
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.