Model comparison

Molmo 2 8b vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #267 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Molmo 2 8b leads 25.6 to 22.3.

Side by side

Molmo 2 8b and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifications
Molmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.131.9
Released—2024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$5.60
Results tracked543

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
WeirdML—16%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.8%
LMArena Coding—1292
BigCodeBench Complete—55.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
TheAgentCompany—5.7%
BALROG—16.2%
METR Time Horizons—35.8%

Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads

Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12871271
DTBench—62.9%
LMCA—13.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129
ForecastBench—57.5
HellaSwag—84.8%
PIQA—82.6%
WinoGrande—82.3%

Math Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
Omni-MATH—33%
LMArena Math—1283
MATH Level 5—63.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
MMLU-Pro—63.1%
Confabulations—19.1%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
LMArena Expert—1245
ARC (AI2) Challenge—94.5%
MMLU—85.3%
TriviaQA—71.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Vision1081—

Multilingual Molmo 2 8b leads

Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English12761252
LMArena Chinese—1272
LMArena French—1280
LMArena German—1234
LMArena Japanese—1180
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1264
LMArena Spanish—1256

Instruction Following Molmo 2 8b leads

Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12701254
IFEval—80.6%

Long Context Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1282

Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads

Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text12881269
LMArena Creative Writing—1221
WildBench—80.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1272

Frequently asked questions

Is Molmo 2 8b better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper