Model comparison
Molmo 2 8b vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 4 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Molmo 2 8b leads 49.4 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1287 | 1028 |
Math Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1089 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1081 | — |
Multilingual Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1276 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | 1023 |
Long Context Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 996 |
Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Molmo 2 8b better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.