Model comparison

Mixtral 8x7B vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Sonar leads 71.4 to 51.0.
  • Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.70 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • Sonar accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 32K.
  • Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x7B and Sonar specifications
Mixtral 8x7BSonar
ProviderMistral AIPerplexity
Noometry Index27.138.5
Released2023-12-112024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window32K128K
Max output32K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.70$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.70$1
Results tracked387

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Sonar leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BSonar
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1126—
HumanEval+39.6%—
MBPP+49.7%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BSonar
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1115—
DTBench49.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
Adversarial NLI55.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.47—
ForecastBench56.3—
HellaSwag86.7%—
LiveBench—46.9%
PIQA83.6%—
WinoGrande77.2%—

Math Sonar leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BSonar
Omni-MATH10.5%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1147—
MATH Level 510%—
GSM8K74.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BSonar
GPQA Diamond30.6%—
MMLU-Pro33.5%—
GPQA (HELM)29.6%—
LMArena Expert1088—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.3%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA85.8%—
TriviaQA82.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BSonar
LMArena Non-English1077—
LMArena Chinese1055—
LMArena French1166—
LMArena German1114—
LMArena Japanese931—
LMArena Korean968—
LMArena Russian1090—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
IFEval57.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1109—

Long Context Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BSonar
LMArena Longer Query1103—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BSonar
LMArena Text1132—
LMArena Creative Writing1109—
WildBench67.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1115—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x7B better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mixtral 8x7B or Sonar?

Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is Mixtral 8x7B or Sonar better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Sonar does, with 128K tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper