Model comparison
Mixtral 8x7B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Mixtral 8x7B costs 6.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.70 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 32K.
Side by side
| Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2023-12-11 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 32K | 131K |
| Max output | 32K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.70 | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.70 | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1126 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 39.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 49.7% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mixtral 8x7B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads
Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1115 | — |
| DTBench | 49.6% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.3 | — |
| HellaSwag | 86.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 77.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 10.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1147 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 10% | — |
| GSM8K | 74.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 30.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 33.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1088 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 87.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 85.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 82.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mixtral 8x7B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1077 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1055 | — |
| LMArena French | 1166 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 931 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 968 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1090 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 57.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1109 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1103 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1132 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1109 | — |
| WildBench | 67.3% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1115 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mixtral 8x7B better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Mixtral 8x7B costs 6.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mixtral 8x7B or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 32K.
How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.