Model comparison

Mixtral 8x22B vs StarCoder 2 3B

Mixtral 8x22B has enough public results to be ranked (#333); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 3B NVIDIA

36.3

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x22B scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 3B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 3B leads 33.5 to 24.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 50.2% for Mixtral 8x22B and 21.4% for StarCoder 2 3B.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x22B and StarCoder 2 3B specifications
Mixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
ProviderMistral AINVIDIA
Noometry Index27.136.3
Released2024-04-172024-02-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked347

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding StarCoder 2 3B leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329), StarCoder 2 3B: 33.5

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
BigCodeBench Complete50.2%21.4%
HumanEval+72%27.4%
WeirdML3.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct40.6%—
LMArena Coding1166—
MBPP+64.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
Epoch Capabilities Index122.0388.76
LMArena Hard Prompts1150—
DTBench55.1%—
ForecastBench56.3—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
Omni-MATH16.3%—
LMArena Math1184—
MATH Level 524.2%—
GSM8K—21.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
MMLU77.8%36.6%
GPQA Diamond34.1%—
MMLU-Pro46%—
GPQA (HELM)33.4%—
LMArena Expert1113—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—34.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Non-English1128—
LMArena Chinese1116—
LMArena French1166—
LMArena German1141—
LMArena Japanese1037—
LMArena Korean1057—
LMArena Russian1158—
LMArena Spanish1151—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
IFEval72.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1147—

Long Context Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Longer Query1144—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Text1162—
LMArena Creative Writing1141—
WildBench71.1%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1130—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x22B better than StarCoder 2 3B?

Mixtral 8x22B has enough public results to be ranked (#333); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Mixtral 8x22B or StarCoder 2 3B better for coding?

StarCoder 2 3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x22B and StarCoder 2 3B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x22B has 34 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 3B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper