Model comparison

Mixtral 8x22B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Mixtral 8x22B has enough public results to be ranked (#333); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x22B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
Mixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.1—
Released2024-04-172024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked346

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
WeirdML3.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct40.6%—
LMArena Coding1166—
BigCodeBench Complete50.2%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+64.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Epoch Capabilities Index122.03113.14
LMArena Hard Prompts1150—
DTBench55.1%—
ForecastBench56.3—
HellaSwag—76.8%
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Omni-MATH16.3%—
LMArena Math1184—
MATH Level 524.2%—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
MMLU77.8%68%
GPQA Diamond34.1%—
MMLU-Pro46%—
GPQA (HELM)33.4%—
LMArena Expert1113—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1128—
LMArena Chinese1116—
LMArena French1166—
LMArena German1141—
LMArena Japanese1037—
LMArena Korean1057—
LMArena Russian1158—
LMArena Spanish1151—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
IFEval72.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1147—

Long Context Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Longer Query1144—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1162—
LMArena Creative Writing1141—
WildBench71.1%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1130—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x22B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Mixtral 8x22B has enough public results to be ranked (#333); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x22B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x22B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper