Model comparison

Mistral vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 35.2 to 16.6.

Side by side

Mistral and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
MistralStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index29.939.2
Released——
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral: 33.8 (#250), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding11621316

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral: 22.2 (#200), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts11491299

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral: 22.3 (#278), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math11801304
Omni-MATH7.2%—

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral: 16.6 (#288), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert11251279
MMLU-Pro27.7%—
GPQA (HELM)30.3%—

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral: 32.8 (#254), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English11291290
LMArena Chinese11091331
LMArena Russian11681324
LMArena French1180—
LMArena German1155—
LMArena Japanese1013—
LMArena Korean1032—
LMArena Spanish1143—

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral: 52.6 (#288), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following11521287
IFEval56.8%—

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral: 35.0 (#245), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query11531307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral: 37.0 (#260), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text11651321
LMArena Creative Writing11581328
LMArena Multi-Turn11471292
WildBench66%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper