Model comparison

Mistral vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #95 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 40.3 to 16.6.
  • Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B specifications
MistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.943.2
Released—2025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked2218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral: 33.8 (#250), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding11621439

Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral: 22.2 (#200), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts11491428

Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral: 22.3 (#278), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Math11801426
Omni-MATH7.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral: 16.6 (#288), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert11251442
MMLU-Pro27.7%—
GPQA (HELM)30.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral: 32.8 (#254), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English11291405
LMArena Chinese11091463
LMArena French11801452
LMArena German11551424
LMArena Japanese10131385
LMArena Korean10321394
LMArena Russian11681408
LMArena Spanish11431428

Instruction Following Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral: 52.6 (#288), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following11521406
IFEval56.8%—

Long Context Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral: 35.0 (#245), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query11531420

Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral: 37.0 (#260), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Text11651420
LMArena Creative Writing11581366
LMArena Multi-Turn11471428
WildBench66%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper