Model comparison

Mistral vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.4

Rank #297 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.1

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 16.3.

Side by side

Mistral and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
MistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.451.1
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked2229

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Mistral: 33.2 (#249), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding11621472
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Mistral: 21.3 (#199), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts11491457
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.27

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Mistral: 20.5 (#275), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Math11801465
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
Omni-MATH7.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Mistral: 16.3 (#283), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Expert11251476
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
MMLU-Pro27.7%—
GPQA (HELM)30.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Mistral: 33.0 (#249), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English11291436
LMArena Chinese11091487
LMArena French11791449
LMArena Russian11681444
LMArena Spanish11431452
LMArena German1155—
LMArena Japanese1012—
LMArena Korean1032—

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Mistral: 52.9 (#283), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following11521437
IFEval56.8%—

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Mistral: 35.0 (#240), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query11541457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Mistral: 37.2 (#255), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text11651447
LMArena Creative Writing11581435
LMArena Multi-Turn11471456
WildBench66%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper