Model comparison

Mistral vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

Mistral and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.9 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct specifications
MistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.929.9
Released—2024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.80
Output $ / M tokens—$8.40
Results tracked226

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral: 33.8 (#250), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Coding1162—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
OSWorld—5%

Reasoning Mistral leads

Mistral: 22.2 (#200), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36%
LMArena Hard Prompts1149—

Math Not comparable

Mistral: 22.3 (#278), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Omni-MATH7.2%—
LMArena Math1180—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral: 16.6 (#288), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
MMLU-Pro27.7%—
GPQA (HELM)30.3%—
LMArena Expert1125—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Vision—1107
Video-MME—73.5%
GeoBench—62%
SpatialViz-Bench—33.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral: 32.8 (#254), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1129—
LMArena Chinese1109—
LMArena French1180—
LMArena German1155—
LMArena Japanese1013—
LMArena Korean1032—
LMArena Russian1168—
LMArena Spanish1143—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral: 52.6 (#288), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
IFEval56.8%—
LMArena Instruction Following1152—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral: 35.0 (#245), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1153—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral: 37.0 (#260), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Text1165—
LMArena Creative Writing1158—
WildBench66%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1147—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Mistral and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.9 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

How many benchmarks do Mistral and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper