Model comparison

Mistral Small vs Ring-2.6-1T

Mistral Small has enough public results to be ranked (#243); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.4

Rank #243 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small scores higher in 0 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 40.7 to 34.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 26.5% for Mistral Small and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.

Side by side

Mistral Small and Ring-2.6-1T specifications
Mistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
ProviderMistral AIAnt Group (inclusionAI)
Noometry Index33.436.9
Released2024-02-262026-05-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output256K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked393

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Ring-2.6-1T leads

Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
SciCode26.5%42.4%
ALE-Bench497.62432.57
BigCodeBench Instruct36.1%—
LiveBench Coding36.2%—
LMArena Coding1362—
BigCodeBench Complete46.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.1%—

Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads

Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
CritPt0%3.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning44.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1335—
DTBench70.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis53.7%—
LMCA20.6%—
LiveBench44%—

Math Not comparable

Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20255.8%—
LiveBench Math39.9%—
LMArena Math1341—
MATH Level 546.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
GPQA Diamond47.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
LMArena Expert1291—
MMLU68.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Vision1142—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Non-English1315—
LMArena Chinese1340—
LMArena French1337—
LMArena German1340—
LMArena Japanese1275—
LMArena Korean1259—
LMArena Russian1324—
LMArena Spanish1346—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
LiveBench Instruction Following63.7%—
LMArena Instruction Following1310—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Longer Query1327—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Text1338—
LMArena Creative Writing1305—
LMArena Multi-Turn1344—
LiveBench Language30.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Mistral Small has enough public results to be ranked (#243); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Mistral Small or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small and Ring-2.6-1T share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small has 39 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper