Model comparison

Mistral Small vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Mistral Small has enough public results to be ranked (#243); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Mistral Small and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
Mistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.4—
Released2024-02-262024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output256K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked396

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
SciCode26.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct36.1%—
LiveBench Coding36.2%—
LMArena Coding1362—
BigCodeBench Complete46.6%—
ALE-Bench497.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning44.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1335—
DTBench70.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis53.7%—
LMCA20.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.14
HellaSwag—76.8%
LiveBench44%—
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20255.8%—
LiveBench Math39.9%—
LMArena Math1341—
MATH Level 546.8%—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
MMLU68.7%68%
GPQA Diamond47.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
LMArena Expert1291—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Vision1142—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1315—
LMArena Chinese1340—
LMArena French1337—
LMArena German1340—
LMArena Japanese1275—
LMArena Korean1259—
LMArena Russian1324—
LMArena Spanish1346—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LiveBench Instruction Following63.7%—
LMArena Instruction Following1310—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Longer Query1327—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1338—
LMArena Creative Writing1305—
LMArena Multi-Turn1344—
LiveBench Language30.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Mistral Small has enough public results to be ranked (#243); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Small has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper