Model comparison

Mistral Small vs Qwen-14B

Mistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.1

Rank #238 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #273 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small leads 52.6 to 27.8.

Side by side

Mistral Small and Qwen-14B specifications
Mistral SmallQwen-14B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.130.8
Released2024-02-262023-09-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K—
Max output256K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked3918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 33.5 (#242), Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Coding13631072
SciCode26.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct36.1%—
LiveBench Coding36.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete46.6%—
ALE-Bench497.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Small: 27.9 (#87), Qwen-14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Mistral Small: 19.3 (#238), Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts13361027
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning44.8%—
DTBench70.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis53.7%—
LMCA20.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—112.8
LAMBADA—71.1%
LiveBench44%—
PIQA—79.9%

Math Qwen-14B leads

Mistral Small: 15.4 (#287), Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Math13411068
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20255.8%—
LiveBench Math39.9%—
MATH Level 546.8%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small: 30.9 (#214), Qwen-14B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
MMLU68.7%66.3%
GPQA Diamond47.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
LMArena Expert1293—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small: 32.9 (#91), Qwen-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1142—

Multilingual Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 45.7 (#164), Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English13151042
LMArena Chinese13421077
LMArena French1337—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese1275—
LMArena Korean1260—
LMArena Russian1324—
LMArena Spanish1346—

Instruction Following Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 66.6 (#204), Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following13101031
LiveBench Instruction Following63.7%—

Long Context Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 40.4 (#151), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query13271029

Writing & Preference Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 52.6 (#165), Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Text13381051
LMArena Creative Writing13041028
LMArena Multi-Turn13441022
LiveBench Language30.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small better than Qwen-14B?

Mistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Small or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Mistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper