Model comparison

Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Mistral Small 4 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 4 Mistral AI

30.2

Unranked Sparse

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 48.4 to 21.2.
  • Mistral Small 4 is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Mistral Small 4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Small 4 and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Mistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.251.4
Released—2026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output210K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.075$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$7.50
Results tracked133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 4: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
LMArena Coding—1498
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Small 4: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Mistral Small 4: 21.2, Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench—70.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1483
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.74

Math Not comparable

Mistral Small 4: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
LMArena Math—1488

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small 4: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
LMArena Expert—1488

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 4: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English—1475
LMArena Chinese—1533
LMArena Russian—1482

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 4: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1460

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 4: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1484

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small 4: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1450
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 4 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Mistral Small 4 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 4 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Mistral Small 4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 4 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 4 has 1 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper