Model comparison

Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Mistral Small 3 has enough public results to be ranked (#268); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

30.9

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 45.3% for Mistral Small 3 and 39.8% for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.
  • Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.
  • Qwen2.5 14B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 33K.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct specifications
Mistral Small 3Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.938.2
Released2025-01-302024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window33K131K
Max output16K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$1.40
Results tracked243

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.1 (#187)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct45.3%39.8%
BigCodeBench Complete50.4%52.2%
LMArena Coding1246—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1233—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.06—

Math Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
LMArena Math1240—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
GPQA Diamond47.3%—
Confabulations25.2%—
LMArena Expert1202—
MMLU—79.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1198—
LMArena Chinese1204—
LMArena French1202—
LMArena German1211—
LMArena Japanese1111—
LMArena Korean1188—
LMArena Russian1216—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1214—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1246—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Text1234—
LMArena Creative Writing1195—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing707—
LMArena Multi-Turn1217—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3 better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3 has enough public results to be ranked (#268); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3 or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 14B Instruct lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

Is Mistral Small 3 or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper