Model comparison

Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen Turbo

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

30.9

Rank #268 Confirmed

Qwen Turbo Alibaba (Qwen)

26.8

Rank #329 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 47.3% for Mistral Small 3 and 41.8% for Qwen Turbo.
  • Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.05 / $0.20 for Qwen Turbo.
  • Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.
  • Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3 and Qwen Turbo specifications
Mistral Small 3Qwen Turbo
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.926.8
Released2025-01-302024-11-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window33K1M
Max output16K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$0.20
Results tracked243

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203), Qwen Turbo: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen Turbo
BigCodeBench Instruct45.3%—
LMArena Coding1246—
BigCodeBench Complete50.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269), Qwen Turbo: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen Turbo
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1233—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.06—

Math Too close to call

Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen Turbo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%6.1%
LMArena Math1240—
MATH Level 5—56.2%

Knowledge Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen Turbo
GPQA Diamond47.3%41.8%
Confabulations25.2%—
LMArena Expert1202—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231), Qwen Turbo: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen Turbo
LMArena Non-English1198—
LMArena Chinese1204—
LMArena French1202—
LMArena German1211—
LMArena Japanese1111—
LMArena Korean1188—
LMArena Russian1216—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224), Qwen Turbo: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following1214—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206), Qwen Turbo: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen Turbo
LMArena Longer Query1246—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275), Qwen Turbo: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen Turbo
LMArena Text1234—
LMArena Creative Writing1195—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing707—
LMArena Multi-Turn1217—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3 better than Qwen Turbo?

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3 or Qwen Turbo?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen Turbo lists at $0.05 and $0.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Qwen Turbo share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper