Model comparison

Mistral Small 3 vs Phi-4 Mini

Mistral Small 3 and Phi-4 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Small 3 leads 36.5 to 28.1.
  • Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.075 / $0.30 for Phi-4 Mini.
  • Phi-4 Mini accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3 and Phi-4 Mini specifications
Mistral Small 3Phi-4 Mini
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.230.9
Released2025-01-302024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window33K128K
Max output16K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$0.075
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$0.30
Results tracked243

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Phi-4 Mini
SciCode—10.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct45.3%—
LMArena Coding1246—
BigCodeBench Complete50.4%—

Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads

Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Phi-4 Mini
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1233—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.07—

Math Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295), Phi-4 Mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Phi-4 Mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
LMArena Math1240—

Knowledge Too close to call

Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Phi-4 Mini
GPQA Diamond47.3%—
Confabulations25.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.5%
LMArena Expert1202—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Non-English1198—
LMArena Chinese1204—
LMArena French1203—
LMArena German1211—
LMArena Japanese1111—
LMArena Korean1188—
LMArena Russian1216—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229), Phi-4 Mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Instruction Following1214—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211), Phi-4 Mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Longer Query1246—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280), Phi-4 Mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Text1234—
LMArena Creative Writing1195—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing707—
LMArena Multi-Turn1217—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3 better than Phi-4 Mini?

Mistral Small 3 and Phi-4 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3 or Phi-4 Mini?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Phi-4 Mini lists at $0.075 and $0.30.

Is Mistral Small 3 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Phi-4 Mini does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper