Model comparison
Mistral Small 3 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 36.3 to 16.3.
Side by side
| Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-01-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 33K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1246 | 1291 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.4% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1233 | 1272 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.07 | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1240 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1202 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 25.2% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1198 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1204 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1203 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1211 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1193 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1214 | 1247 |
Long Context Too close to call
Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1246 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1234 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1195 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1217 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 707 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Small 3 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mistral Small 3 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.