Model comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3 leads 37.6 to 26.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 40.4% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 62.3% for Step 3.
Side by side
| Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 40.5 |
| Released | 2025-06-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0938 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Step 3: 40.1 (#147)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | 62.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.74 | — |
Math Step 3 leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
Knowledge Step 3 leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Step 3: 46.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Step 3: 70.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Step 3: 40.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1321 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Step 3 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.