Model comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen1.5-7B
Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 45.0 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-06-20 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0938 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1107 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1065 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.74 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-7B leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-7B leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1058 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1035 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen1.5-7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.