Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 26.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 88.9% for Muse Spark.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.2 and Muse Spark specifications
Mistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Noometry Index31.250.6
Released2025-06-202026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0938—
Output $ / M tokens$0.25—
Results tracked627

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
SciCode—51.5%
LMArena Coding—1481

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
Epoch Capabilities Index131.74152.04
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt—11.3%
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1474

Math Muse Spark leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530.3%88.9%
ProofBench—17%
LMArena Math—1455
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
GPQA Diamond49.1%89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1457

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English—1464
LMArena Chinese—1509
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following—1442

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Muse Spark
LMArena Text—1474
LMArena Creative Writing—1459
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1255—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Muse Spark share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper