Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.4

Rank #263 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

36.5

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.9 to 13.7.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.35 input and $0.56 output per million tokens.
  • Step 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.1 and Step 3.7 Flash specifications
Mistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index31.436.5
Released2025-03-172026-05-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K256K
Max output102K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.35$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$0.56$1.11
Results tracked285

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175), Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
SciCode—40%
LMArena Coding1309—
ALE-Bench—694.12

Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249), Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—39.7%
CritPt—2.3%
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1278—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.48—

Math Step 3.7 Flash leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20253.9%—
Omni-MATH24.8%—
LMArena Math1261—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond41.9%—
MMLU-Pro61%—
GPQA (HELM)39.2%—
LMArena Expert1258—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1136—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1255—
LMArena Chinese1254—
LMArena French1270—
LMArena German1266—
LMArena Japanese1210—
LMArena Korean1206—
LMArena Russian1263—
LMArena Spanish1283—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
IFEval75%—
LMArena Instruction Following1264—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1300—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1278—
LMArena Creative Writing1253—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing761—
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1270—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.

Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 3.7 Flash does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper