Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.1 vs StarCoder 2 3B

Mistral Small 3.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#263); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.4

Rank #263 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 3B NVIDIA

35.8

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 3B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Small 3.1 leads 37.7 to 32.9.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.1 and StarCoder 2 3B specifications
Mistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
ProviderMistral AINVIDIA
Noometry Index31.435.8
Released2025-03-172024-02-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output102K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.35—
Output $ / M tokens$0.56—
Results tracked287

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175), StarCoder 2 3B: 32.9

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Coding1309—
BigCodeBench Complete—21.4%
HumanEval+—27.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
Epoch Capabilities Index127.4888.01
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1278—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20253.9%—
Omni-MATH24.8%—
LMArena Math1261—
GSM8K—21.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
GPQA Diamond41.9%—
MMLU-Pro61%—
GPQA (HELM)39.2%—
LMArena Expert1258—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—34.2%
MMLU—36.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Vision1136—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Non-English1255—
LMArena Chinese1254—
LMArena French1270—
LMArena German1266—
LMArena Japanese1210—
LMArena Korean1206—
LMArena Russian1263—
LMArena Spanish1283—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
IFEval75%—
LMArena Instruction Following1264—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Longer Query1300—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Text1278—
LMArena Creative Writing1253—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing761—
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1270—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than StarCoder 2 3B?

Mistral Small 3.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#263); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Mistral Small 3.1 or StarCoder 2 3B better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and StarCoder 2 3B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 3B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper