Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen2.5-Max
Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 55.6 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 40.1 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1359 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), Qwen2.5-Max: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5-Max leads
Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | 132.54 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1360 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Qwen2.5-Max leads
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1369 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5-Max leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1335 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1358 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5-Max leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1364 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen2.5-Max?
Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen2.5-Max share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.