Model comparison

Mistral Nemo vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

26.4

Rank #337 Confirmed

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 37.5 to 12.3.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.15 for Mistral Nemo.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Mistral Nemo and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Mistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderMistral AINVIDIA
Noometry Index26.440.0
Released2024-07-012026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output128K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$0.20
Results tracked1018

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Coding—1375

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.6%—
BALROG17.6%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts—1337
DTBench48.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.68—
PIQA83.5%—

Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Math—1359
MATH Level 510.8%—
GSM8K84.2%—

Knowledge Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
GPQA Diamond29.9%—
LMArena Expert—1356
BoolQ82.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English—1295
LMArena Chinese—1359
LMArena French—1366
LMArena German—1282
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1238
LMArena Russian—1253
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following—1318

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Nemo: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query—1314

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral NemoNemotron 3.5 Lightning
EQ-Bench Creative Writing8811280
LMArena Text—1327
LMArena Creative Writing—1254
LMArena Multi-Turn—1328

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Nemo better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo lists at $0.15 and $0.15.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper