Model comparison

Mistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 37.0 to 25.0.
  • Both cost about the same: $1.50 input and $7.50 output per million tokens.

Side by side

Mistral Medium and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Mistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.338.1
Released2023-12-112025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output262K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.50$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$7.50$7.50
Results tracked3625

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
WeirdML43.7%41.2%
LMArena Coding14341412
ALE-Bench763.98461.45
FrontierCode8%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
SciCode40.2%—
GSO—4.9%
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.7%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark50%49.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts14261372
CritPt0%—
DTBench75.5%—
LMCA26.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14081365
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202532.2%—
ProofBench9%—
MATH Level 581.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14081338
GPQA Diamond59.5%—
Humanity's Last Exam4.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate22.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Vision1172—

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14081346
LMArena Chinese14471357
LMArena French14591398
LMArena German14321325
LMArena Japanese13781310
LMArena Korean13801305
LMArena Russian14111366
LMArena Spanish14331360

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13981355

Long Context Too close to call

Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14061378

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14241357
LMArena Creative Writing13911333
LMArena Multi-Turn14181365
Short-Story Creative Writing77.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Mistral Medium or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper