Model comparison

Mistral Medium vs Qwen2-72B

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.0 to 40.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 81.6% for Mistral Medium and 39.1% for Qwen2-72B.

Side by side

Mistral Medium and Qwen2-72B specifications
Mistral MediumQwen2-72B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.330.0
Released2023-12-112024-06-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked3626

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
WeirdML43.7%11.3%
LMArena Coding14341196
FrontierCode8%—
SciCode40.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—54%
ALE-Bench763.98—

Agentic & Tool Use Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90), Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.7%—
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Too close to call

Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts14261191
Kagi LLM Benchmark50%—
CritPt0%—
DTBench75.5%—
LMCA26.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.28

Math Qwen2-72B leads

Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
LMArena Math14081235
MATH Level 581.6%39.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202532.2%—
ProofBench9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
GPQA Diamond59.5%40.8%
LMArena Expert14081171
Humanity's Last Exam4.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate22.7%—
MMLU—82.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88), Qwen2-72B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
LMArena Vision1172—

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English14081176
LMArena Chinese14471240
LMArena French14591170
LMArena German14321151
LMArena Japanese13781111
LMArena Korean13801083
LMArena Russian14111169
LMArena Spanish14331169

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following13981181

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query14061192

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen2-72B
LMArena Text14241203
LMArena Creative Writing13911181
LMArena Multi-Turn14181196
Short-Story Creative Writing77.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium better than Qwen2-72B?

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Mistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Qwen2-72B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper