Model comparison

Mistral Medium vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.8

Rank #322 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.0 to 23.8.

Side by side

Mistral Medium and Qwen1.5 4b Chat specifications
Mistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.328.8
Released2023-12-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked3613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Coding1434999
FrontierCode8%—
SciCode40.2%—
WeirdML43.7%—
ALE-Bench763.98—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.7%—

Reasoning Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts1426976
Kagi LLM Benchmark50%—
CritPt0%—
DTBench75.5%—
LMCA26.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%—

Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads

Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Math14081026
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202532.2%—
ProofBench9%—
MATH Level 581.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads

Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Expert1408980
GPQA Diamond59.5%—
Humanity's Last Exam4.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate22.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Vision1172—

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Non-English1408979
LMArena Chinese14471024
LMArena German1432902
LMArena Russian1411952
LMArena French1459—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Spanish1433—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Instruction Following1398978

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Longer Query1406988

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Text1424997
LMArena Creative Writing1391969
LMArena Multi-Turn1418977
Short-Story Creative Writing77.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

Mistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper