Model comparison

Mistral Medium vs Qwen1.5-14B

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.0 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

32.1

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.2 to 33.7.

Side by side

Mistral Medium and Qwen1.5-14B specifications
Mistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.032.1
Released2023-12-112024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked3617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 33.8 (#241), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Coding14341138
FrontierCode8%—
SciCode40.2%—
WeirdML43.7%—
ALE-Bench763.98—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#84), Qwen1.5-14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.7%—

Reasoning Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 23.3 (#165), Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14261113
Kagi LLM Benchmark50%—
CritPt0%—
DTBench75.5%—
LMCA26.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%—

Math Qwen1.5-14B leads

Mistral Medium: 27.2 (#238), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Math14091125
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202532.2%—
ProofBench9%—
MATH Level 581.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Qwen1.5-14B leads

Mistral Medium: 24.9 (#260), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Expert14081094
GPQA Diamond59.5%—
Humanity's Last Exam4.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate22.7%—
MMLU—68.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 34.6 (#82), Qwen1.5-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Vision1172—

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 52.3 (#86), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Non-English14081095
LMArena Chinese14481147
LMArena French14601115
LMArena German14331043
LMArena Japanese13781019
LMArena Russian14111046
LMArena Spanish14331085
LMArena Korean1382—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 73.9 (#111), Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Instruction Following13981102

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#108), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Longer Query14061113

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 60.2 (#97), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Text14241128
LMArena Creative Writing13911091
LMArena Multi-Turn14181110
Short-Story Creative Writing77.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium better than Qwen1.5-14B?

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.0 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

Mistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Qwen1.5-14B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper