Model comparison

Mistral Medium vs Qwen-14B

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.0 to 27.6.

Side by side

Mistral Medium and Qwen-14B specifications
Mistral MediumQwen-14B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.331.4
Released2023-12-112023-09-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked3618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
LMArena Coding14341071
FrontierCode8%—
SciCode40.2%—
WeirdML43.7%—
ALE-Bench763.98—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90), Qwen-14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.7%—

Reasoning Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14261027
Kagi LLM Benchmark50%—
CritPt0%—
DTBench75.5%—
LMCA26.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.03
LAMBADA—71.1%
PIQA—79.9%

Math Qwen-14B leads

Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
LMArena Math14081068
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202532.2%—
ProofBench9%—
MATH Level 581.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265), Qwen-14B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
GPQA Diamond59.5%—
Humanity's Last Exam4.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate22.7%—
LMArena Expert1408—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%
MMLU—66.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88), Qwen-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1172—

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English14081041
LMArena Chinese14471077
LMArena French1459—
LMArena German1432—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Russian1411—
LMArena Spanish1433—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following13981031

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query14061028

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumQwen-14B
LMArena Text14241051
LMArena Creative Writing13911028
LMArena Multi-Turn14181022
Short-Story Creative Writing77.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium better than Qwen-14B?

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Mistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Qwen-14B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper