Model comparison

Mistral Medium vs Phi-3.5-mini

Mistral Medium has enough public results to be ranked (#211); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-mini Microsoft

36.4

Unranked Sparse

Side by side

Mistral Medium and Phi-3.5-mini specifications
Mistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index36.036.4
Released2023-12-112024-08-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked365

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Mistral Medium: 33.8 (#241), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
FrontierCode8%—
SciCode40.2%—
WeirdML43.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.8%
LMArena Coding1434—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.5%
ALE-Bench763.98—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#84), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.7%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 23.3 (#165), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
Kagi LLM Benchmark50%—
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1426—
DTBench75.5%—
LMCA26.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%—
PIQA—81%

Math Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 27.2 (#238), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202532.2%—
ProofBench9%—
LMArena Math1409—
MATH Level 581.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—
GSM8K—86.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 24.9 (#260), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
GPQA Diamond59.5%—
Humanity's Last Exam4.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate22.7%—
LMArena Expert1408—
BoolQ—78%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 34.6 (#82), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Vision1172—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 52.3 (#86), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Non-English1408—
LMArena Chinese1448—
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German1433—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1382—
LMArena Russian1411—
LMArena Spanish1433—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 73.9 (#111), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Instruction Following1398—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#108), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Longer Query1406—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 60.2 (#97), Phi-3.5-mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral MediumPhi-3.5-mini
LMArena Text1424—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
Short-Story Creative Writing77.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1418—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium better than Phi-3.5-mini?

Mistral Medium has enough public results to be ranked (#211); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Mistral Medium or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (33.8 vs 34.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper