Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs StarCoder 2 3B

Mistral Medium 3.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#151); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

39.6

Rank #151 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 3B NVIDIA

35.8

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 3B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.5 and StarCoder 2 3B specifications
Mistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
ProviderMistral AINVIDIA
Noometry Index39.635.8
Released—2024-02-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output210K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208), StarCoder 2 3B: 32.9

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena WebDev1263—
LMArena Coding1461—
BigCodeBench Complete—21.4%
HumanEval+—27.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
Epoch Capabilities Index141.4288.01
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)12.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1436—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Math1432—
GSM8K—21.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Expert1431—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—34.2%
MMLU—36.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Vision1222—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Non-English1405—
LMArena Chinese1443—
LMArena French1448—
LMArena German1453—
LMArena Korean1387—
LMArena Russian1396—
LMArena Spanish1406—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1414—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Longer Query1414—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5StarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Text1421—
LMArena Creative Writing1372—
EQ-Bench 4993—
LMArena Multi-Turn1423—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than StarCoder 2 3B?

Mistral Medium 3.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#151); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or StarCoder 2 3B better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and StarCoder 2 3B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 3B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper