Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3 8B
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 9.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 8B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 43.2 to 37.8.
- Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 33.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 210K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.50 | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208), Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1263 | — |
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: —, Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290), Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.42 | 136.17 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113), Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1432 | — |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1222 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1443 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101), Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1414 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen3 8B?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 9.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3 8B?
Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3 8B better for coding?
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Medium 3.5 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 8B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.