Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Palm 2

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Palm 2 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 25.6.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Palm 2 specifications
Mistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
ProviderMistral AIGoogle
Noometry Index40.230.0
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output210K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked2210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
LMArena Coding1461994
LMArena WebDev1264—

Reasoning Palm 2 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14361005
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)12.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.35—

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
LMArena Math14311049

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
LMArena Expert1432—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
LMArena Vision1223—

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
LMArena Non-English1404916
LMArena Chinese1442887
LMArena French1448—
LMArena German1451—
LMArena Korean1385—
LMArena Russian1395—
LMArena Spanish1409—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14151010

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
LMArena Longer Query14151010

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Palm 2
LMArena Text14211027
LMArena Creative Writing1374991
LMArena Multi-Turn1423994
EQ-Bench 4993—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Palm 2?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Palm 2 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper