Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 2 categories and o3-pro in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 43.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 41.4% for Mistral Medium 3.5 and 72.1% for o3-pro.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper at $1.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.2 | 42.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Max output | 210K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.50 | $80 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1264 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | — |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | 72.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.35 | 147.42 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1223 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1442 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1409 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1415 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or o3-pro?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Medium 3.5 does, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and o3-pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.