Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 40.0.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Muse Spark specifications
Mistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Noometry Index40.250.6
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output210K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked2227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
LMArena Coding14611481
LMArena WebDev1264—
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts14361474
Epoch Capabilities Index141.35152.04
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)12.9%—
CritPt—11.3%

Math Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
LMArena Math14311455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
LMArena Expert14321457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65), Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
LMArena Vision12231306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English14041464
LMArena Chinese14421509
LMArena French14481497
LMArena German14511497
LMArena Korean13851459
LMArena Russian13951466
LMArena Spanish14091472

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following14151442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query14151451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark
LMArena Text14211474
LMArena Creative Writing13741459
LMArena Multi-Turn14231477
EQ-Bench 4993—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Muse Spark share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper